$FL2@(#) SPSS DATA FILE Java SPSS Writer (c) pmStation.com  Y@14 Feb 0609:38:08Java SPSS Writer v1.1 http://spss.pmStation.com RESPN Respondent #@@@DATE Submit Date ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ @@@EMAIL E-mail ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ @@@Q1A1 %Please enter some personal info- Name ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ @@@Q1A2 &Please enter some personal info- Email ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ @@@QL2 Please select your position:ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ QV2 Please select your position:@@@QO2 Please select your position:ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ @@@QL3 1Please indicate what field your background is in: ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ QV3 1Please indicate what field your background is in: @@@QO3 1Please indicate what field your background is in: ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ @@@Q6A1 0What do you think this example workflow does?- ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ Q9A1 @In your opinion, how similar is the example workflow to this oneQ9A2 @In your opinion, how similar is the example workflow to this oneQ10A1 @Consider the 6 factors below for deciding on the workflows' simiQ10A2 @Consider the 6 factors below for deciding on the workflows' simiQ10A3 @Consider the 6 factors below for deciding on the workflows' simiQ10A4 @Consider the 6 factors below for deciding on the workflows' simiQ10A5 @Consider the 6 factors below for deciding on the workflows' simiQ10A6 @Consider the 6 factors below for deciding on the workflows' simi@@@Q11A1 @Please enter any other information in the diagram you might be uÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ Q12A1 @How is your confidence in your similarity assessment:- Confidenc@@@Q13A1 @In case you could make a guess at the bioinformatics behind thisÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ Q16A1 @In your opinion, how similar is the example workflow to this oneQ16A2 @In your opinion, how similar is the example workflow to this oneQ17A1 @Consider the 6 factors below for deciding on the workflows' simiQ17A2 @Consider the 6 factors below for deciding on the workflows' simiQ17A3 @Consider the 6 factors below for deciding on the workflows' simiQ17A4 @Consider the 6 factors below for deciding on the workflows' simiQ17A5 @Consider the 6 factors below for deciding on the workflows' simiQ17A6 @Consider the 6 factors below for deciding on the workflows' simi@@@Q18A1 @Please enter any other information in the diagram you might be uÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ Q19A1 @How is your confidence in your similarity assessment:- Confidenc@@@Q20A1 @In case you could make a guess at the bioinformatics behind thisÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ Q23A1 @In your opinion, how similar is the example workflow to this oneQ23A2 @In your opinion, how similar is the example workflow to this oneQ24A1 @Consider the 6 factors below for deciding on the workflows' simiQ24A2 @Consider the 6 factors below for deciding on the workflows' simiQ24A3 @Consider the 6 factors below for deciding on the workflows' simiQ24A4 @Consider the 6 factors below for deciding on the workflows' simiQ24A5 @Consider the 6 factors below for deciding on the workflows' simiQ24A6 @Consider the 6 factors below for deciding on the workflows' simi@@@Q25A1 @Please enter any other information in the diagram you might be uÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ Q26A1 @How is your confidence in your similarity assessment:- Confidenc@@@Q27A1 @In case you could make a guess at the bioinformatics behind thisÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ Q30A1 @In your opinion, how similar is the example workflow to this oneQ30A2 @In your opinion, how similar is the example workflow to this oneQ31A1 @Consider the 6 factors below for deciding on the workflows' simiQ31A2 @Consider the 6 factors below for deciding on the workflows' simiQ31A3 @Consider the 6 factors below for deciding on the workflows' simiQ31A4 @Consider the 6 factors below for deciding on the workflows' simiQ31A5 @Consider the 6 factors below for deciding on the workflows' simiQ31A6 @Consider the 6 factors below for deciding on the workflows' simi@@@Q32A1 @Please enter any other information in the diagram you might be uÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ Q33A1 @How is your confidence in your similarity assessment:- Confidenc@@@Q34A1 @In case you could make a guess at the bioinformatics behind thisÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ Q37A1 @In your opinion, how similar is the example workflow to this oneQ37A2 @In your opinion, how similar is the example workflow to this oneQ38A1 @Consider the 6 factors below for deciding on the workflows' simiQ38A2 @Consider the 6 factors below for deciding on the workflows' simiQ38A3 @Consider the 6 factors below for deciding on the workflows' simiQ38A4 @Consider the 6 factors below for deciding on the workflows' simiQ38A5 @Consider the 6 factors below for deciding on the workflows' simiQ38A6 @Consider the 6 factors below for deciding on the workflows' simi@@@Q39A1 @Please enter any other information in the diagram you might be uÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ Q40A1 @How is your confidence in your similarity assessment:- Confidenc@@@Q41A1 @In case you could make a guess at the bioinformatics behind thisÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ Q42A1 @Please indicate how important it is, in your opinion, to have thQ42A2 @Please indicate how important it is, in your opinion, to have thQ42A3 @Please indicate how important it is, in your opinion, to have thQ42A4 @Please indicate how important it is, in your opinion, to have thQ43A1 @How did you find this exercise in comparing workflow diagrams?- Q43A2 @How did you find this exercise in comparing workflow diagrams?- Q43A3 @How did you find this exercise in comparing workflow diagrams?- @@@Q44A1 @Please enter any remaining comments & remarks you may have here:ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@ ÿÿÿÿ@@  áçýýýýþþþþð?2006-02-03 08:36:25.0 þþþþþþþþþýýþþþþþPaul Fisher þýýýþþþþfisherp@cs.man.ac.uk þýýýýþþþPhD/MSc Bioinformatics student þýþþþþþþ@þþýþþþþþOther þþýýýýþþ@Biology and Computing þþþýýýýýBlasts a probeset id against a database ýýýýÿýýýsequence file to retriev@@ð?@ýýýýýýýý@@@relative service names for each flow of ýýýýýýýýdata, e.g. from probeset@A greater abundance of informatiýýýýýÿýýon is retrieved giving a more de@@@ýýýýýýýý@ð?@@order of the services used þþþþýýýý@again more information iýýýýýýýýs retrieved. In this case additional ser"@@@ýýýýýþþþ@@@@@þþþþþýýý@it does not perfýýýýýýýÿormt eh same task at all. it seems to retrieve a@ýýýýýýþþ@@@@@@þþþþþþýý@sequenceýýýýýþþý retrieval only, not blast search @ýýýýýýýý"@@@@@@@size of ýýýýýýýýthe workflow and number of outputs based on the number oð?ýýýýýýýýthis workflow is centered around a blast search where a sequenceýýýýýýýþð?@ð?ð?@@@þþþþþþþý@ýýýþþþþþ2006-02-03 10:01:07.0 þþþþþþþþýýþþþþþþPhilip McDermottýýýýþþþþphilip.mcdermott@cs.man.ac.uk ýþþþþþþþOther ýýýýþþþþ@PhD Computer Science þýýþþþþþComputer Scienceþýþþþþþþ@þþýýýýýýLooks up a probe set in a database and puts it týýýýÿÿýýhrough Blast and@@@@ýýþþþþþþ@@þþýýýýýý@Applies more processes to the same data,ýýýýýÿÿý or possily the same pro@@@ýýýþþþþþð?@@þþþýþþþþ@þþþþýýÿÿ@@ýýýýþþþþ@@@@þþþþýþþþ@þþþþþýýÿ"@"@ÿýýýýþþþ@@@@þþþþþýþþ@þþþþþþýý@@ÿÿýýýýþþ@@@@þþþþþþýþ@þþþþþþþý@ýýýýýýþþ@@@@@@þþþþþþýý@2006-02-ýýþþþþþþ03 10:05:39.0 þþþþþþþýVictoriaýþþþþþþý Brackenvictoriaýýýýþþþý.bracken@postgrad.man.ac.uk PhD/MSc ýýýþþþþýBioinformatics student @þþþþþþþþýþþþþþþþBiology ýþþþþþþþð?þýýýýýýýTakes a probeSetId input and feeds the seqence into blasýýýýýýýýt for a @@@@@@@ýþþþþþþþ@þýýýýýýý@retrieves more information from the same input. ýýýýýýýý these extra inp @@@@@@ýýþþþþþþ@@þþýýýýýý@the input is modified before being used ýýýýýÿÿýto query databases and p @ @@ýýýþþþþþ@@@þþþýþþþþ@þþþþýýýý@@ð?@ýýýýþþþþ@@@@þþþþýýýý@The example workflow takýýýýýýýýes the output from the other workflow an"@"@@ýýýýýþþþ@@@@@þþþþþýþþ@þþþþþþýýð?ð?ýýýýýþþþ@@@@@þþþþþýýý@2006-02-03 10:07ýþþþþþþþ:19.0 þþþþþþýýCiaran Shier þþþþþþýýciaran.shier@posýýýþþþýýtgrad.manchester.ac.uk PhD/MSc Bioinforýýþþþþýþmatics student @þþþþþþþýBiology þþþþþþþýð?þþþþþþþþýýýýýýýýUses a probeSetId as its input. Gets the sequence from the ID. Týÿýýýýýý@ð?@@@@@þþþþþþþþýýýýýýýý@searches for and returns more informtion relating to theýýÿýýýýý probeId@@@@@@ýþþþþþþþ@þýþþþþþþ@þþýýýýýý@@@@@@ýýþþþþþþ@@þþýþþþþþ@þþþýýýýý@@@@@ýýýþþþþþ@@@þþþýýýýý@no blast search so returns the sýýýýýýýýequence not blast results. "@"@@@ýýýýþþþþ@@@@þþþþýþþþ@þþþþþýýý@ð?@ýýýýþþþþð?@@@þþþþýýýý@2006-02-03 10:10:39.0 þþþþþþþþþþþþþýýþjohn starkovich þþþþþýýýjohn.starkovich@postgradýýýþþýýý.manchester.ac.uk PhD/MSc Bioinformatics sýþþþþýþþtudent @þþþþþþýþBiology þþþþþþýþð?þþþþþþþýTakes inýýýýýýýý from the user a probe ID of some sort- perhaps a code f@ýýýýýýýþ@@@@@@@þþþþþþþý@ýýýýýýýýThis not only does a Blast search, but also returns other piecesýýýýýýýý@@@@@@@@þþþþþþþþýýýýýýýý@This workflow takes in the id probe, then searches embl,ýýýýýýýý and the@@@@@@@ýþþþþþþþ@þýýýýýýý@This has additional functionality in that it doeýýýýýýýýs a basic query @@@@@@ýýþþþþþþ@@þþýþþþþþ@þþþýýýýý@@@@@ýýýþþþþþ@@@þþþýýýýý@This has much more functionalityýýýýýýýý, and does much more in depth quð?ð?@@ýýýþþþþþ@@@þþþýýýýþ@2006-02-03 10:13:48.0 þþþþþþþþþþþþýýþþDavid Withers þþþþýýýýdavid.withers@manchester.ac.uk þþþþýýþþDeveloper þþþþýþþþ@þþþþþýýþComputer Scienceþþþþþýþþ@þþþþþþþþþþþþþþÿý@ÿÿýýýýþþ@ð?@@þþþþþþýþ@þþþþþþþÿýÿÿýýýýþ@@ð?@@þþþþþþþý@þþþþþþþþÿýÿÿýýýý"@@ð?@@þþþþþþþþýþþþþþþþ@þÿýÿÿýýý@@ð?@ýþþþþþþþ@þýþþþþþþ@þþÿýÿÿýý"@@ð?ýýþþþþþþ@@þþýþþþþþ@þþþýýýýÿ@@@@ýýþþþþþþ@@þþýýýýþþ@2006-02-03 10:17:49.0 þþþþþþþþþþþýþþþþJie CHENþþþýýýýþjie.chen-2@postgrad.man.ac.uk þþþýýýýþPhD/MSc Bioinformatics student þþþýþþþþ@þþþþýþþþBiology þþþþýþþþð?þþþþþýýýmaking an input to get aýýýýýýýýn output than conbine the outut and dta@@@ýýýýýþþþð?@ð?@@þþþþþýþþ@þþþþþþýý@@ýýýýýýþþ@@@@@@þþþþþþýþ@þþþþþþþý@ýýýýýýýþ@@@@ð?@@þþþþþþþý@þþþþþþþþýýýýýýýý@@@@@ð?@@þþþþþþþþýþþþþþþþ@þýýýýýýý"@"@@ð?ð?ð?ð?ýþþþþþþþð?þýþþþþþþ@þþýýýýýýð?@@ð?@@ýþþþþþþþ@þýýýýþþþ @2006-02-03 10:18:38.0 þþþþþþþþþþýýþþþþgareth whiteley þþýýýýýýgareth.whiteley@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk þþýýýýþþPhD/MSc Bioinformatics student þþýþþþþþ@þþþýþþþþOther þþþýýþþþ@Geneticsþþþþýýýýthis gets the probe ids as inputýýýýýýýý, finds the corresponding probe @@@@ýýýýþþþþ@@@@þþþþýþþþ@þþþþþýýÿ@@ÿÿÿÿÿþþþþþþþþýþþ@þþþþþþýý @ @ÿÿÿÿÿÿþþþþþþþþýþ@þþþþþþþý @ýÿÿÿÿÿÿþ @þþþþþþþý@þþþþþþþþýýÿÿýýýý"@"@@@@@þþþþþþþþýþþþþþþþ@þýýýýýýýð?ð?ð?ð?ð?ð?ð?ýýýýþþþþsorry, my brain was not working ýýýýþþþþ"@2006-02-03 10:20:35.0 þþþþþþþþþýýþþþþþPaul Whitesman þýýýýýþþpaul.whtesman@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk þýýýýþþþPhD/MSc Bioinformatics student þýþþþþþþ@þþýþþþþþBiology þþýþþþþþð?þþþýýýýýTakes a probe sequence (primer perhaps).ýýýýýýýý Finds out if it'll attð?@@@@ýýýýýþþþ@@@is the same þþþýþþþþ@þþþþýýýý"@"@@@ýýýýþþþþ@@@@þþþþýþþþ@þþþþþýýý"@"@@ýýýýÿþþþ@@@@þþþþþÿþþþþþþþþýý@@ýýýýýýþþ@@@@@@þþþþþþýþ@þþþþþþþý"@ýýýýýýýþ"@@@@@@@þþþþþþþý@þþþþþþþþýýýýýýýýð?ð?ð?ð?ð?ð?ð?Didn't uýýýýýþþýnderstand what I was doing. SORRY. $@ýýýþþþþþ2006-02-03 10:22:34.0 þþþþþþþþýýþþþþþþJames Sinnott ýýýþþþþþsinnottj@cs.man.ac.uk ýýþþþþþþResearcher ýþþþþþþþð?þýýþþþþþComputer Scienceþýþþþþþþ@þþýýýýýýPerforms a blastx search on a sequence returned ýýÿýÿÿýýby an Affymetrix@@@ýýýýýýýý@@Overall shape of the workflow graph. The numberýýýýýýýý of services. @It seems to be performing the same task ýýýÿýÿÿýas the example workflow,"@ð?ýýýýýýýý@@ð?Overall shape of the workflow graph. Thýýýýýýýýe number of services. @Doesn't seem to be peforming theýýýþýýÿÿ same task at all. "@"@ýýÿýþþþþð?@ð?þþþþýýýý@Seems to be performing aýýþþþýýÿ different task @@ÿýýýýþþþð?ð?@@þþþþþýýý@Seems to be perfýýýýýýýýorming a subset of the example task - obtaining "@"@ÿÿýýýýþþð?@ð?ð?þþþþþþýý@I think ýýýýýýýýthis does something entirely different from the example ð?ýýýýýýþþ@@@@@@þþþþþþýý&@2006-02-ýýþþþþþþ03 10:23:35.0 þþþþþþþýStuart Oýþþþþþþþwen þþþþþþþýDevelopeýþþþþþþýr @þþþþþþþþýýþþþþþþComputer Scienceýþþþþþþþ@þýýýýýýýcreates a blast output for a set of sequences, identifieýÿýÿÿýýýd by pro@@@@ýþþþþþþþð?þýýýýýýý@extends the example to retreive additional inforýýÿýÿÿýýmation about the@@@ýýýýþþþþ@@service names þþýýýýýý@is determining the sequence from the accýýýÿýÿÿýessionnumber and doing s@@ýýýþþþþþ@@@þþþýýýýý@is using a different mechanism týýýýÿýÿÿo get the sequence and generate @ýýýýþþþþð?@@@þþþþýýýýð?stops with the sequence ýýýýýÿýÿretreived from getSequenceReturn, and do"@ÿýýýýýýý@@@@input and output names, ýýþþþýýýservice names @not a clue what ýýýýýþýýit does but looks very different. @@ýýýýýþþþ@@@@@þþþþþýýý(@2006-02-03 10:27ýþþþþþþþ:56.0 þþþþþþýýStephen Bennett þþþþþþýýStephen.Bennett-ýýýýþþýý2@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk PhD/MSc Bioinforýýþþþþýþmatics student @þþþþþþþýOther þþþþþþþý@ýýþþþþþþchemistry ýýýýýýýýtakes a sequence from the probe after taking the desired isolateýýýýýýýý@@@@@ð?ð?ð?þþþþþþþþýþþþþþþþ@þýýýýýýý@@@@@@ð?ýþþþþþþþð?þýþþþþþþ@þþýýýýýý@@@@@@ýýþþþþþþ@@þþýþþþþþ@þþþýýýýý @@@@@ýýýþþþþþ@@@þþþýþþþþ@þþþþýýýý@@@@ýýýýþþþþð?ð?ð?ð?þþþþýþþþ@þþþþþýýýð?@@ýýýýþþþþ@@@@þþþþýýýý*@2006-02-09 12:31:53.0 þþþþþþþþþþþþþýýþPhil Lord þþþþþýýýphillip.lord@newcastle.aýþþþþýýþc.uk Researcher þþþþþýþþð?þþþþþþýþOther þþþþþþýý@Bioinforýþþþþþþýmatics performsýýýýýýýý a blast search over some genes pulled out from microarr@ýýýýýýýý@@ð?@@@@clearer ýýýþþþþýnames for the services ð?ýýýýýýýýit's a classic 'tell me everything you know about'. This one jusýýýýýýýý@@@ð?@@ð?ð?ýýýýýýýýAgain, it's trying to achieve the same thing, in a different wayýþþþþþþþð?þýÿýýýýý@@@@@@ýþþþþþþþ@þýýýýýýý@you have different identifers to start off, so iýýýÿýýýýt probably comes@@@@@ýýþþþþþþ@@þþýýýýýýð?it's a sequence retrieval, rather than aýýýýýýýýttempting to find out an"@"@@@@ýýýþþþþþ@@@þþþýýýýýð?I think it's trying to identify ýýýýýýýýnew hits compared to a previous ð?ð?@@ýÿÿþþþþþ@þþþü